Louisiana SLEA was first sued when Vault Corporation sued Quaid Software Ltd. for copyright infringement, embezzlement of business secrets and patent infringement. [6] Vault submitted that Quaid`s actions in the dismantling and dismantling of PROLOK constituted a breach of the software license agreement. As a result, quaid would violate the Louisiana Uniform Trade Act with respect to the misappropriation of trade secrets by the Louisiana License Enforce Act. [7] The personnel manual contains information on the employment of all employees of the Salt Lake City School District. In addition to the manual, written agreements, negotiated agreements and written agreements are negotiated and/or negotiated between contract groups and the Salt Lake City School District, pursuant to the salt Lake City Schools Board. The Louisiana Software License Enforcement Act refers to the License Enforcement Act (SLEA) software, adopted by the State of Louisiana. The bill was passed in September 1984 under Title 51 (Commerce and Trade) of Louisiana Revised Statutes by the Louisiana State Legislature. Sponsored and largely written by Vault Corporation, the SLEA defines the authorized terms of a software license agreement and the applicability requirements. The determination of the engineering, decompilation or dismantling of Louisiana SLEA was quashed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software, Ltd., 847 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.

1988). The Louisiana SLEA consists of sections 1961-1966 of Title 51 of Louisiana Revised Statutes, which define the following definitions, applicability requirements, accepted licensing conditions, correct display of licensing conditions and application. In accordance with Section 1963, a software license agreement can only be applied if the following conditions are met:[1] In accordance with Section 1964, the terms of a software license agreement may allow the licensee to retain ownership of a licensed software copy. In the event of a continuation, the agreement may also contain the following restrictions on the end-user`s ability:[2] This bill aims to significantly strengthen the ability of software publishers and distributors to assert their rights under trade secrets and copyright laws. This bill strikes a balance between the legitimate interests of the software industry in preventing piracy and the legitimate interests of customers who purchase copies of software in accordance with licensing agreements. In addition, the licensee may automatically terminate the software license agreement without notice if the licensee has breached a provision of the contract. [2] The SLEA was introduced by Senator William Atkins and Representative Al Ater into Louisiana State Law. [3] Proponents of the law hoped it would support the growth of the software industry in Louisiana. [3] [5] In September 1984, it was adopted with minimal opposition. [4] [5] Louisiana was the first state to pass the SLEA and the only state to pass the bill, as written by Vault Corporation. [4] The bill has been criticized for being “special interest legislation aimed at improving the economic position of software vendors without doing anything substantial to challenge software piracy,” said Jay BloomBecker.

[4] Vault Corporation`s, a company that developed software protection systems (anti-piracy tools), was awarded to President Krag Brotby for saying, “[Vault] helped write most of the bill… and that the announcement coincided with Softcon, which arrived in New Orleans. [3] Brotby predicted that the law would provide a model for the other 49 states; Vault Corp.