To assess the compliance of available tonometers for clinical practice with the Goldmann Applanting Spectometer (GAT), the most commonly accepted reference device. First, we systematically classify each document according to the aspect of the pa that is being examined and we have an overview of the reports on the mechanisms put in place by the Palestinian Authority. In addition, we rank the literature according to its general assessment of the agreement and identify documents that present the PaPA as a primarily positive or negative development, or we propose a mixed assessment that has both positive and negative aspects, without favouring one over the other. This basic information provides our systematic map of the literature of the Paris Convention – a descriptive overview of the types of studies in this field, their main areas of study, common periodicals, etc. Metadata comes directly from the Web of Science and Scopus platforms. We have grouped the mechanisms used to inform our research (Table 1) and then classify each document by group of mechanisms that review it. We have added a “general” category for relevant documents, which are not explicitly one of the groups of mechanisms, but which cover more than one mechanism or the Palestinian Authority in general.4 We finally rank the literature according to its overall assessment of the Paris Agreement and we distinguish between documents that the Palestinian Authority generally considers to be a positive, negative or non-positive (mixed) development. We include an N/A category for documents that do not evaluate PaPa. We found such a systematic synthesis of qualitative evaluations of ex ante policies methodically difficult. Most of the mechanisms put in place by the Palestinian Authority are not yet operational and can therefore only be assessed ex ante. As such, much of the literature we are examining is not explicitly related to effectiveness.

In addition to analyses of the ambitions of existing NDCs, there is little aggregated data on the effectiveness of the Palestinian Authority. This has made it difficult to systematically synthesize this research. The identification of common engines, barriers and recommendations has therefore been a diverse interpretation, a task made even more complex by the complexity of the Palestinian Authority itself and by the various epistemal communities that examine it. While our results remain informative, the unreliability of the intercoder in this part of the analysis is a significant restriction. In addition, the effort required to develop a code book iteratively and then encode each document reduces this task in its scalability. At least it requires planning with significant resources for coding from the beginning (proposal) phase of the project. We limit the publication date to 2016 and from 2016. Given that the Palestinian Authority was closed in December 2015, this ensures that the identified documents are relevant to the Palestinian Authority and not to previous climate agreements. RedD .

This mechanism was in place long before the Palestinian Authority was negotiated. We found that most redD studies focused on projects that excluded PA and were not relevant to our analysis of Dad`s effectiveness.