In any event, the terms of any agreement must be considered where there are specific provisions regarding the circumstances of the compensation holder (if those circumstances are extensive or restricted). The agreement was fiercely rejected by Algeria and the Polisario Front, which continued to commit to independence. Algeria sent a high-level delegation to Madrid to pressure Spain not to sign the agreements and began, in early 1975, to support the Polisario Front militarily and diplomatically. Algeria officially saw its opposition as a way to stop the UN Charter and fight colonialism, although many observers felt that Algeria`s action was more intended to counter Morocco`s influence and gain access to the Atlantic Ocean. A long-standing rivalry between the two countries has contributed to the tense relations. [Citation required] In early 1975, Morocco and Mauritania agreed to comply with the International Court of Justice`s decision on the status of the Spanish Sahara, but when the Tribunal ruled in October 1975[5] that neither country had the right to claim sovereignty over the territory, both governments decided to ignore the decision. In November 1975, they concluded the Madrid agreements with Spain, under which Morocco acquired two-thirds of the territory north, while Mauritania acquired the southern third. The agreement also provided that Spain would retain shares in the mining company Bu Craa. Mauritania accepted the agreement, probably rightly, to say that Morocco, with its superior military power, would otherwise have absorbed the entire territory. [6] [7] The United Nations considers Western Sahara to be a non-sovereign territory and awaits formal decolonization. He acknowledges that Morocco currently manages much of it, but neither the General Assembly nor any other UN body has ever recognized this as sovereignty. In a 2002 letter from the Unse due noted to the Secretary-General for Law and Legal Counsel, Hans Corell, in which he expressed an opinion on the legality of the measures taken by the Moroccan authorities when signing contracts for the exploration of mineral resources in Western Sahara, said: “In the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, the state of emergency and related measures came into force by the Spanish royal decree 463/2020 of 14 March 2020, which came into force on the same day. Fundamental rights cannot be suspended in a state of emergency (unlike situations of exception and siege, which are more serious).

This means that the measures taken by the government, even if they are restrictive, must respect the “essential core” of fundamental rights. The Study by the United States Library of Congress on Mauritania (1990) indicates that the future of the province had been in dispute for several years, with Morocco and Mauritania both calling for the total annexation of their territory and Spain attempting to establish either a regime of internal autonomy or a state independent of Spain and the Sahara. In addition, an independent group of indigenous Sahrawis, called the Polisario Front, sought independence through the guerrillas. Since 1963, the United Nations has regarded the territory as a colony and has called for self-determination in accordance with General Assembly Resolution 1514. [Citation required] It is a constitutional measure that allows the government to take exceptional measures to deal with serious disruptions to normality, such as a health crisis.